Web Letters: Obama's Evolving Foreign Policy

By Robert Dreyfuss

This article appeared in the July 21, 2008 edition of The Nation.

July 1, 2008

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

If you prefer, you may submit a letter to the print edition only.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • There is so much information in this article, one almost doesn't know where to begin. Obama doesn't have a clue about foreign policy, the military, development or economics. Building "democracies" comes out of the neoconservative Clean Break play book available on the web. Even the Israelis are leery of that one because they got Hamas in a free and fair election. Better the dictator you know than the uncertainty of elections. While I have no objections to "free and fair " elections, I do not believe that democracy can be imposed from the outside. As has been noted in other articles by this author with regard to Iran, pushing for democracy from the outside and associating it with regime change bring about repressive policies against native people seeking democracy separate from the foreign policies of other countries.

    I am dead set against "missionary" foreign policies. Democracy needs to be a result of "self determination" and native to the country in which it occurs. All politics must be local. However, we could be helpful with economic development, and I don't mean "free trade." The current scramble for Africa and the global South is not about colonies, but it is about using "free trade" to control the natural resources for industrial development in other countries. Developing countries need trade barriers so they can use their natural resources to develop their own industrial base. This is how the US became a major industrial nation! Africa does not need to sell their agricultural product abroad but needs to be food-independent and serving local economies. This is development! Obama's advisers the same people who got the ball rolling on this current economic mess. Bush made it worse, but they started this economic idiocy.

    Pervis J. Casey

    Riverside, CA

    07/03/2008 @ 1:28pm


Most Read

Issues »

Most Emailed

Issues »

Popular Topics

Blogs

» The Dreyfuss Report

Obama's Gaffe on India | He ought to be urging India to talk to Pakistan, not cross the border to "catch" the bad guys.
Robert Dreyfuss

» Editor's Cut

Bread, Bombs, and the Big Stimulus | We need a smart and focused inside-outside strategy to revive our frayed social compact -- now more critical than ever.
Katrina vanden Heuvel

» The Beat

Grijalva for Interior Secretary | Obama's considering an outstanding prospect for an important position.
John Nichols

» State of Change

Disappointment in Georgia | Palin's pick, Saxby Chambliss, wins the last Senate election of 2008.
John Nichols

» And Another Thing

Can you help "Nickie"? | Bringing the abortion debate down to earth
Katha Pollitt

» The Notion

DC to Delhi: Only Our Missiles -- Not Yours | What is Rice going to say to India: only DC not Delhi is allowed to bomb Pakistan?
Laura Flanders

» Act Now!

World AIDS Day | How to help in the fight against the AIDS pandemic.
Peter Rothberg

» Passing Through

Forget GM's Plan -- Where's The Government's Plan? | Create a demand for green cars.
Jane Hamsher

» Capitolism

Is Personnel Policy? | How much do personnel choices reflect the Obama administration's policy direction
Christopher Hayes